Verification of Flexitime clocking operations - Council
Opinion of 12 November 2009 on the notification for prior checking on the "Verification of Flexitime clocking operations with respect to data on physical access" (Case 2009-477)
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 lays down the data protection obligations for the EU institutions, bodies and agencies when they process personal data and develop new policies. This regulation also defines the obligations of the EDPS, including his role as an independent supervisory authority of EU institutions and bodies when they process personal data, and to advise on policies and legislation which affect privacy and cooperate with similar authorities to ensure consistent data protection.
Opinion of 12 November 2009 on the notification for prior checking on the "Verification of Flexitime clocking operations with respect to data on physical access" (Case 2009-477)
Opinion of 11 November 2009 on the notification of a prior check in relation to the file ‘persons with reduced mobility – emergency plan’ (Case 2009-0014)
Analysis of the EDPS on a consultation on the draft implementing rules of the European Training Foundation (ETF)
Opinion of 9 November 2009 on the notification for prior checking regarding the EESC internal administrative investigations and disciplinary proceedings dossier (Case 2008-569)
On the basis of Article 2(3) of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations, General Implementing Provisions governing disciplinary procedures and administrative investigations were adopted by the European Economic and Social Committee on 7 December 2005.
The EDPS has formulated recommendations, in particular as regards data quality, time-limits for data storage (in relation specifically to the personal file but also to traffic data and hearings), rights of access and rectification and the confidentiality declaration to be provided to data subjects.
Opinion of 30 October 2009 on a notification for prior checking concerning "EAS (European Administrative School) - Emotional Intelligence 360 degree assessment" (Case 2009-100)